Krebsforum Lazarus

Bitte loggen sie sich ein oder registrieren sie sich.

Einloggen mit Benutzername, Passwort und Sitzungslänge
Erweiterte Suche  

Neuigkeiten:

.
[*quote*]
--------------------------------------------
Radiologia & Salud @RX_SALUD 27.4.2017



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C-Z97-vXYAAAVVK.jpg

#Radiologìa #Veterinaria en #Caballos 🐎

#Veterinary #Radiology in #Horses 🐴
--------------------------------------------
[*/quote*]

more:
https://twitter.com/aribertdeckers/status/861986161555800065

Mäuse haben es leichter ... :-)

Autor Thema: Johnson&Johnson must pay $72 million for cancer death linked to talcum powder  (Gelesen 493 mal)

Khan

  • Globaler Moderator
  • Vollwertiges Mitglied
  • *****
  • Beiträge: 192

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-johnson-johnson-verdict-idUSKCN0VW20A?utm_source=twitter

[*QUOTE*]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business | Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:47pm EST
Johnson&Johnson must pay $72 million for cancer death linked to talcum powder
By Jonathan Stempel


Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) was ordered by a Missouri state jury to pay $72 million of damages to the family of a woman whose death from ovarian cancer was linked to her use of the company's talc-based Baby Powder and Shower to Shower for several decades.
[...]

The verdict is the first by a U.S. jury to award damages over the claims, the lawyers said.

Johnson & Johnson faces claims that it, in an effort to boost sales, failed for decades to warn consumers that its talc-based products could cause cancer. About 1,000 cases have been filed in Missouri state court, and another 200 in New Jersey.

Fox, who lived in Birmingham, Alabama, claimed she used Baby Powder and Shower to Shower for feminine hygiene for more than 35 years before being diagnosed three years ago with ovarian cancer. She died in October at age 62.

Jurors found Johnson & Johnson liable for fraud, negligence and conspiracy, the family's lawyers said. Deliberations lasted four hours, following a three-week trial.
[...]

The case is Hogans et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al, Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 1422-CC09012.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]

more:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-johnson-johnson-verdict-idUSKCN0VW20A?utm_source=KF-LAZARUS


I am utmost astonished about talcum being allowed in a powder, in this case even in baby powders.
Gespeichert